If you have the standard cheapo-desktop drives like seagate 'cudas, then you are just looking for trouble. This issue may occur if the disk is "surprise removed." For example, this behavior may occur if you remove the disk without using the Safely Remove Hardware icon in the notification this proves you had recoverable errors, unless the Hdd had a lot of application IO adding load. Possibly a driver glitch? 0 LVL 3 Overall: Level 3 Windows 7 1 OS Security 1 Message Active today Expert Comment by:pacsadminwannabe2010-05-14 Comment Utility Permalink(# a32769859) Yeah I'd say so navigate here
SUBSCRIBE! Can anyone shed any light? From research and experience, that's about right for a 500 GB drive (actually two 500 GB drives in a raid 1 array, so chkdsk still see's it at one 500 GB So far vmProtect hasn't failed a backup task. http://aikitsupport.com/fix-events-137-57-source-ntfs-relates-storagecraft-shadow-copy-provider/
It deoesn't seem to affect anything. Note: You must keep a note before running chkdsk /f on a volume make sure drive is not used by any critical applications or by OS – for example SQL Database Thx Here is the full code of the error below Log Name: System Source: Ntfs Date: 5/12/2010 3:34:37 PM Event ID: 57 Task Category: (2) Level:
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter for tech news and trends Membership How it Works Gigs Live Careers Plans and Pricing For Business Become an Expert Resource Center About Us Who We All three point the finger at someone else. It’s always good practice it use single VSS provider and we will go for native provider rather choosing a 3rd party hardware or software provider. Event Id 50 Ntfs Delayed Write Failed based on 1.5 hrs, it is obvious the disk performed internal block recovery.
but these "warnings" still show up in the event log and no one can find why. Event Id 140 Microsoft-windows-ntfs The only way to remove them is to restart the vCenter server because if you right click on the task cancel is grayed out. We haven't solved how to stop it yet though, perhaps a new thread might be more appropriate? This and 137, 12289 can be safely ignored.
Ocasionally a backup fails still, but if you reinstall VMWare tools, it runs fine for awhile until you have to do it again. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/7337ea95-f49f-4ee4-a354-8db8a1c5f9ab/windows-server-backup-2008-r2-getting-disk-and-ntfs-errors?forum=windowsbackup Sunday, July 21, 2013 12:08 PM Reply | Quote Moderator Microsoft is conducting an online survey to understand your opinion of the Technet Web site. Event Id 137 Ntfs Vmware Thanks for your help. Event Id 137 Ntfs Server 2012 Highfive believes we need to embrace a new alternative.
then what does that tell you? http://arxlabsolutions.com/event-id/ntfs-error-137.php On Windows Xp, it does indeed lock the ext drives as long as the service is running. you should get decent enterprise disks. With Carbonite not installed (we setup a test machine to make sure) VSS shuts down when idle and Ghost then shuts down it's services and the drive can be unlocked, thus Event Id 140 Ntfs Windows 2012 R2
The manufacturers expect this. I get very concerned when I start seeing errors showing up in my event viewer on a domain controller. I had consistant troubles with a few backups and it was due to the speeds on the one NIC in the team. his comment is here Top Login to post comments Sun, 2014-09-14 16:59 #11 mithcd Offline Forum Member Joined: 2014-07-27 Posts: 93 Same as what I did.
We will have to see what happens when the Ghost services are stopped for 12 hours on the machine this thread is about. Vmware Kb: 2006849 The drives are optimized for quick removal, but Norton Ghost seems to lock the drives in use when it's service is running. In case you don't have one you can apply for it at Acronis Web Site.
What concerns the share access issue - it appears to be related to Linux 'samba' module which has issues with support of "NTLMv2 response only\refuse LM & NTLM" scheme. Lots of people use them, and why would Dell sell it, and it has worked well until now. Corruption may occur." Google, Microsoft, and EE searches haven't yielded much help based on the details of the event. Fsutil Resource Setautoreset True Therefore, event ID 57 is not logged when a FAT32 drive is surprise-removed.
Event 12289 is in normal operation. status, and perform a media verify (if this feature is available. Thx all! http://arxlabsolutions.com/event-id/ntfs-error-50.php As for the I-just-formatted-so-there-shouldnt-be-any-errors ...
Corruption may occur. Spreading some love to dlethe also for all his/her help. Corruption may occur." This is repeated multiple times during the backup process. Apart from this I do also suggest to check the vssadmin writers status and other related components I have ran “vssadmin list writers” which results all writers stable You must also
A colleague mentioned seeing a similiar error (event 57 but from fdisk instead of ntfs as the source) on a Windows XP machine recently. The errors I am seeing are: Log Name: System Source: Disk Date: 16/07/2013 8:38:15 PM Event ID: 15 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: Server.domain.local Description: The Funny thing is Acronis can SEE archives, just not write to them (unless using a local account on our SAN). MenuExperts Exchange Browse BackBrowse Topics Open Questions Open Projects Solutions Members Articles Videos Courses Contribute Products BackProducts Gigs Live Courses Vendor Services Groups Careers Store Headlines Website Testing Ask a Question
What's the common factor?